Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Expand view Topic review: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by Glyn Ruck » Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:38 am

"I am not surprised that no one knows the answer...."

The real issue is that no one knows the question thus the comment above is somewhat patronising.

It is really an obsolete problem long solved with better understanding of conductors & how to manufacture them for differing purposes. In this case to prevent inductive coupling and allowing them to run in parallel as they do in so many designs without issue.

Peace!

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by JCS » Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:12 am

Glyn

“…..The trouble with questions like that is that they are not defined and really amount to “How long is a piece of string?"………….

Maybe,……. but If the answer enlightened one soul in the workings of the ignition it will have served its purpose. The pictures in question alone make the point that there are owners out there who are not aware of the problem.

One has only to read the various Jaguar threads to realise that the lessons of old, including the likes of Ignition cable routing, S.U Carburettors, Cylinder and Piston and Crankshaft dampers have long been forgotten. The fact that these troubles have long ago been taken through the mill and cured seems lost on the average owner.

It is unfortunate that the workshop and parts manuals of the time are not always an easy read because they assumed that the reader would hold a City & Guilds Technicians Certificate. This is not helpful to the owner and we are left with gaps that although simple to some professionals occasionally require some explanation.

Until recently I contributed to the general engineering or seminar instruction of both USA and UK car clubs and I can assure you that almost 100% of those attending are not aware of ignition induction. One can only run with one’s experience, and it was this that made me decide to point out the potential problem.

Most of the cars I see have had the ignition leads straightened out by unwise or unknowing owners and mechanics and now have no relationship to ex-factory specification. If owners want to avoid any chance of ignition induction the best way is to ensure leads are crossed over every 8 inch or so.

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by Glyn Ruck » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:17 pm

The trouble with questions like that is that they are not defined and really amount to "How long is a piece of string?"

Jaguar's sheath & clamping system from distributor to head conduit ensure that HT leads run parallel on later S Types for much of the distance. As long as the HT cables are copper twisted multicore all should be fine (induction substantially ameliorated between individual cables). My car has the earlier separator ring system that will help with some basic conductors by spacing them.

The moral of the story is to use copper multi twisted core HT cable.

Cars with sheath.


Pics courtesy of Alan Wiedie
Image


Image


Typical E Type.


Image

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by NigelW » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:19 pm

Thank you Norman for the answer, I should have spotted that. I wasnt aware the leads are platted in the sleeve as when I got my car the were straight and I dispensed with the sleeve for that reason.

I recently finished my house extension and I was on the backs of the electricians making sure the TV, computer cat 5e and mains cables were not running parallel or in close proximity to each other due to induction. When I worked in telecoms it was something we had to be aware of especially working on thousand pair junction cables that used twisted pairs.

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by Glyn Ruck » Sun Jul 28, 2019 6:32 pm

I think many of us are more than aware of inductive coupling in parallel wires/conductors. I'm even conscious of it in my Hi End Audio hobby.

There are many methods of ameliorating it ~ the most common/easiest being the twisting of multicore conductors.

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by JCS » Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:40 pm

Ok Guys,

First we will let Orlando have a chance with the next question on another subject, after this one.

I am not surprised that no one knows the answer, it is one that very few mechanics know, and as years roll by even less people are able to answer.
Even from the 60’s onwards successive engineers have forgotten the lesson. The problem appears not to have been known, at least in automotive circles until the 50’s. Bentley seemed to be unaware when he designed the Lagonda engine subsequently fitted to the Aston Martin DB2, engineers designing the RR V8 scored no better. Surprisingly Jaguar engineers did take action and I well remember the plaited HT leads within the sleeve in the new Mk X’s in 1963. If we dare straighten out the leads we had about 30 secs before we were looking for another job……..but hey today even main agents can sell HT lead organisers obviously they need some education!

The fault in the images is that the HT leads are fitted with the leads running parallel to each other for a considerable distance. This results in induction when unwanted cylinders fire when the leads are paralleled for somewhere exceeding 5 to 6 inches. In fact in this case the problem is so severe that the ignition IS suffering from induction problems. The leads should be crossed over each other, preferable every 6 inch or so.

A few decades ago I attended Technical College for many years and subsequently taught part time in automotive engineering. Throughout that time we used to invite the local technical representative of Champion to bring along their special induction rig to demonstrate HT lead induction. This demonstration was as follows:-

The engine used was a single cylinder test petrol engine rigged up to show this phenomenon in action. It was the single cylinder Caterpillar engine normally used by oil companies as the standard test engine to evaluate oils for piston ring sticking.

The engine had a H.T ignition lead of around six to seven feet long which was cut across at its centre that is the cable had been sliced so that the
lead was in two parts. One section connected to the magneto, one to the sparking plug. The engine was started by holding the two ends close
together, but so that any observer could see the H.T spark jump between the leads. The two sections of lead were then stretched out parallel with each other for about three feet and the cut ends separated. In this situation there was no direct link between the plug and magneto. The engine continued to run, up and down its normal revolution band from idle to full throttle without any misfire, and without a direct H.T lead connection.
When the room lights were turned out, it was equally obvious that no spark was jumping between the leads and the engine was operating only by induction of H.T across the lead. This proved that an engine could be operated, and H.T induction did occur when the H.T leads remained parallel for some distance within an ignition H.T harness.

Many years ago I purchased two cars that had faults that the factories and local dealers could not rectify. One was a 1987 Mini that could not be driven above 55 mph, the other about 1992 was a 1400c Vauxhall Astra with odd misfires. These cars were less than 12 months old and offered at very generous discounts. After looking under the bonnets of both cars, establishing the leads were paralleled, I was parted with my money and soon made my fortune after repositioning the leads.

Take note there is no physical jumping of the spark when this problem exists, the feeling is that the acceleration is being restricted.

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by NigelW » Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:45 pm

How about the brake fluid reservoir is not clear as to check the fluid level?

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by jonesdl » Sun Jul 28, 2019 3:29 pm

I would not have put the HT leads so close to the fuel pipe feed banjo on the front carb ?.
I have run out of idea's !!.
Dave J.

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by NigelW » Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:55 am

This is driving me mad, keep staring at the photos but cant see anything obviously wrong. Please Norman give us the answer.

Re: Heavily Modified 3.8S from Aus.

by Glyn Ruck » Sun Jul 28, 2019 12:25 am

I don't like where the fire extinguisher is mounted but doubt that is what bothers Norman.

Top