by JCS » Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:21 pm
This thread is quite interesting from a terminology view as well as the actual arrangement. No one has commented but two different systems are described: -
1. A simple overflow system where the radiator is pressurised but the overflow pipe and overflow container are at ambient pressure. Used initially by Cass with his plastic bag and in fact myself for the last 55 years on various cars.
2. A system that has the complete overflow system fully pressurised including the overflow pipe and tank, effectively this is a radiator header tank extension. This system was original used by manufacturers to enable packaging of lower front ends whilst maintaining header tank height and accessibility. In the case of Rover, they used the pressurised overflow, unusually without excessive height on the Rover 2000 TC to make up for loss of coolant by inserting the oil cooler in the bottom radiator tank.
Both systems will allow coolant overflow and reversal coolant flows, but the fully pressure system No 2 can be potentially dangerous, depending on the header tank location and the hose and clipping arrangement. This system also does not allow the radiator cap to be depressurised unless the system is cool.
I have system No 1 with the metal header tank under the left wing (fender) but with that expansion tank overflow pipe well below suspension height, avoiding any coolant or steam egressing over the disk brake.
Although I utilise the MG overflow tank it is fitted with a flat cap whilst the radiator has a 7lbs normal pressure cap. This maintains the cooling system completely full and under bonnet access is completely standard and safe.
Has anyone thought about these systems?
Norman
This thread is quite interesting from a terminology view as well as the actual arrangement. No one has commented but two different systems are described: -
1. A simple overflow system where the radiator is pressurised but the overflow pipe and overflow container are at ambient pressure. Used initially by Cass with his plastic bag and in fact myself for the last 55 years on various cars.
2. A system that has the complete overflow system fully pressurised including the overflow pipe and tank, effectively this is a radiator header tank extension. This system was original used by manufacturers to enable packaging of lower front ends whilst maintaining header tank height and accessibility. In the case of Rover, they used the pressurised overflow, unusually without excessive height on the Rover 2000 TC to make up for loss of coolant by inserting the oil cooler in the bottom radiator tank.
Both systems will allow coolant overflow and reversal coolant flows, but the fully pressure system No 2 can be potentially dangerous, depending on the header tank location and the hose and clipping arrangement. This system also does not allow the radiator cap to be depressurised unless the system is cool.
I have system No 1 with the metal header tank under the left wing (fender) but with that expansion tank overflow pipe well below suspension height, avoiding any coolant or steam egressing over the disk brake.
Although I utilise the MG overflow tank it is fitted with a flat cap whilst the radiator has a 7lbs normal pressure cap. This maintains the cooling system completely full and under bonnet access is completely standard and safe.
Has anyone thought about these systems?
Norman