by cass3958 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:36 pm
I have seen this before Jose and it does mention the XJ3.
In development the Mk1 saloon had been known as the Utah, the Mk2 was christened Utah Mk2, and therefore the factory named the independent rear suspension Mk2 as Utah Mk3. It also went by the new Jaguar codename of XJ3. As with all Jaguars of the period, Utah Mk3/XJ3 would use the twin cam XK engine in 3.4- and 3.8-litre capacities.
I think like the old times we have hijacked this thread and moved on to new ground. Perhaps it should be reclassed Jose.
I have seen this before Jose and it does mention the XJ3.
In development the Mk1 saloon had been known as the Utah, the Mk2 was christened Utah Mk2, and therefore the factory named the independent rear suspension Mk2 as Utah Mk3. It also went by the new Jaguar codename of XJ3. As with all Jaguars of the period, Utah Mk3/XJ3 would use the twin cam XK engine in 3.4- and 3.8-litre capacities.
I think like the old times we have hijacked this thread and moved on to new ground. Perhaps it should be reclassed Jose.